Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vishal Tansukhbhai Gohel Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Services Tax No. 10867 of 2017-DB
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/05/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Vishal Tansukhbhai Gohel Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

This case before the CESTAT Ahmedabad centered on the issue of whether service tax was applicable on the margin earned by a firm from ocean freight charges recovered from customers. Here’s a breakdown of the key points and the tribunal’s ruling:

  1. Background: The appellant, a clearing and forwarding agent firm, was registered for service tax under the relevant category. The Department observed a positive difference between the freight expenses incurred and the freight charged to customers. They considered this difference as excess amount charged by the appellant towards ocean freight.
  2. Department’s Argument: The Department demanded service tax from the appellant under the category of Business Auxiliary Service, asserting that the differential amount of freight retained was akin to commission received for providing a service.
  3. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031