CESTAT Ahmedabad

Utilisation of CENVAT Credit of Excise duty of Defaulted period without any wilful avoidance: CESTAT Quashes penalty u/s 11AC of Central Excise Act

Kalp Corporation Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Kalp Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T. regarding penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act for delayed payment of excise duty and utilization of CENVAT credit....

CESTAT Quashes non-Speaking Excise Duty Demand Order

Koch Chemical Technology Group India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes Central Excise duty demand on petroleum fuels extraction, citing absence of a speaking order. Detailed analysis and implications....

CENVAT Credit eligible on Correct Excise Duty Payment on Rotogravure Printing Cylinders

Modern Packaging Company Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad allows CENVAT credit for the supplier of Rotogravure Printing Cylinders who had paid excise duty correctly. In-depth analysis of the case....

Excise Duty/Interest/Penalty Demands Not Sustainable for Mere Wrong Mention of Registration in Payment

Vidyut Corporation Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Read the CESTAT Ahmedabad's order in Vidyut Corporation vs. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman, where excise duty demands, interest, and penalties are deemed unsustainable due to a mere wrong mention of registration in payment....

CENVAT Credit Eligibility Tied to Law at Service Receipt Time: CESTAT

Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs C.C.E.-Ahmedabad-ii (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad rules on CENVAT credit eligibility. Intas Pharmaceuticals allowed to claim credit based on law at service receipt, not credit availing date....

CESTAT Upholds Denial of VCES Benefit Due to Violation of Section 106 of Finance Act

Archna Traders Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Explore CESTAT Ahmedabad's decision in Archna Traders vs. C.C.E. & S.T. on denial of VCES Scheme benefit under Section 106 of Finance Act 2013. Full analysis here....

Penalty under Rule 25 & Section 11AC Unsustainable Without Suppression of Facts

Ambica Engineering Works Vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Legal battle between Ambica Engineering Works and C.C.E. & S.T. in light of alleged misapplication of Exemption Notification No. 6/2022-CE and penalty imposed under Rule 25 and Section 11AC. ...

CENVAT Credit Allowed for Management Consultancy Services under Rule 6(5) of CCR

Sabic Innovative Plastics India Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

The CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of Sabic Innovative Plastics India Pvt Ltd, allowing CENVAT credit for Management Consultancy Services and halting enforcement of demand notice....

No Excise Duty on Exempted Steam with Reversed CENVAT Credit

C.C.E. & S.T Vs Shreno Limited (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

CESTAT Ahmedabad's verdict on C.C.E. & S.T vs. Shreno Limited case regarding excise duty demand under Rule 6(3) of CCR when CENVAT credit is reversed on common input services for exempted steam....

SSI Exemption for Submersible Pumps Meeting BIS Standards: CESTAT Ahmedabad

Prithvi Pumps Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)

Explore CESTAT Ahmedabad's verdict on SSI exemption for Submersible Pumps adhering to BIS standards. Learn about the case, analysis, and conclusions....

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (6,871)
Company Law (10,064)
Corporate Law (13,542)
Custom Duty (10,819)
DGFT (5,156)
Excise Duty (5,616)
Fema / RBI (5,765)
Finance (6,487)
Income Tax (49,813)
SEBI (5,335)
Service Tax (4,889)

Search Posts by Date

February 2024