Bombay High Court held that it is well settled that it is not appropriate for a Court to hold a mini-trial at the stage of grant of temporary injunction
Explore the Openwave India vs Union of India case at Bombay High Court. No notice on refund request for unutilised IGST credit; court orders fresh adjudication, citing violation of natural justice.
Reassessment notice issued under section 148 on the ground that how a newly incorporated company could command a significant share premium, was purely hypothetical and lacked tangible evidence and that could not be a tangible material for arriving at reason to believe escapement of income.
Bombay High Court allows Railroad Logistics to amend GSTR-1 for FY 2018-19, enabling Mahindra & Mahindra to claim Input Tax Credit. Detailed analysis of the judgment provided.
Bombay High Court directs the restoration of GST registration for Red Fox Events, cancelled without a hearing due to unavoidable circumstances. Explore the court’s detailed judgment.
Bombay High Court held that normally a writ petition for a simplicitor money claim would not be maintainable. Accordingly, writ petition, for refund of money of anti-dumping duty paid under the grab of challenge to notification, is unmaintainable.
Read the full text of the judgment/order from Bombay High Court on Anvita Associates vs. Union of India, highlighting the allowance for rectification of GSTR-1 errors and resolution of disputes with Mahindra Logistics.
Bombay High Court held that the Goa Cess Act is intra vires Articles 14, 301, 303 read with Article 304 of the Constitution of India. The same is not subsumed by the GST laws.
Bombay High Court held that denial of benefit under Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 on erroneous allegation of non-filing of Form 4 unjustified as the same is already filed much before the extended date.
Read the full text of Bombay High Court’s judgment quashing the notice under Section 148 for AY 2016-17 in Vardhaman vs. ITO case. Analysis and implications discussed.
