Bombay High Court held that once search action u/s. 132 of the Income Tax Act is the foundation of the case, assessment could be initiated only under section 153A/ 153C. Thus, initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 is liable to be quashed.
Bombay HC directs IT Dept to review H.K. Jewels’ plea on seized gold, citing Section 132(1)(iii) of the IT Act. Petitioners granted time to file representations.
Bombay High Court quashes reassessment notice under Section 148, holding that revisited issues from Section 263 proceedings cannot form the basis for reopening cases.
Bombay HC sets aside IT department’s rejection of a compounding plea due to delay, directing a reconsideration per Supreme Court precedents.
Bombay HC quashes Indusind Media’s reassessment, citing change of opinion and lack of double deduction proof, ruling in favor of the taxpayer.
Bombay HC rejects review petition by Supreme Construction, upholds pre-deposit for appeal, and imposes costs for non-compliance.
Bombay HC affirms 100% addition under S. 69C for unproven purchases, reversing tribunal’s 12.5% estimation. Details on the ruling.
Learn about the Bombay High Court’s decision in Crystal Pride Developers vs ACIT regarding reassessment beyond 4 years under Section 147 of the IT Act, emphasizing the necessity of disclosing material facts. Understand the legal implications and judicial precedents involved.
Bombay HC rules in favor of Nicholas Piramal, allowing community development expenses as business deductions under the Income Tax Act. Appeal by Revenue dismissed.
Bombay High Court held that reassessment proceeding u/s. 148 initiated against non-existing company is not sustainable in law in as much as the department was already informed about the merger. Accordingly, notice quashed.
