Bombay High Court ruled that adjudicating authorities must apply independent thought and consider all submissions, not merely copy-paste from show cause notices.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a tax appeal in PCIT vs. Hans Chemicals, reaffirming that revised CBDT monetary limits apply to pending cases, leading to disposal.
Bombay High Court orders ₹19.44 lakh reward for Darshan Singh Parmar, an informant whose tips led to significant tax recoveries, after a decade-long battle with the Sales Tax Department.
Delhi High Court quashes CIT order, condoning delay in e-verifying Form 10B for Kotak Family Foundation, emphasizing justice over technicality in tax exemptions.
The issue involved in the present appeal is that whether an incentive received in sales tax liability under a Scheme formulated by the State Government would be on capital account, exempt to taxation, or on revenue account, liable for taxation.
Bombay High Court sets aside Section 148 tax notice for Caishen Enterprise LLP, ruling it invalid as it was not issued by a Faceless Assessing Officer.
Bombay High Court grants relief to Magna Automotive India and others, following the precedent set in the M/s. Sundyne Pumps and Compressors India Pvt. Ltd. case.
Bombay High Court directs reconsideration of a Sabka Vishwas Scheme declaration, ruling that admitted service tax liability before the cut-off date constitutes quantification.
Bombay High Court sets aside Sulzer Pumps’ assessment order, citing pending DRP reference and procedural requirements under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act.
Bombay High Court nullifies OmniActive’s assessment order, citing procedural lapse by AO and pending DRP objections under Section 144C.
