Read the full text of Bombay High Court’s judgment quashing the notice under Section 148 for AY 2016-17 in Vardhaman vs. ITO case. Analysis and implications discussed.
Bombay High Court ruling: No penalty for ITR upload mistake. Detailed analysis of the case between Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13 and Pinstorm Technologies Pvt Ltd.
Explore the Shanmukhananda Fine Arts vs. Deputy Director of Income Tax case. Bombay High Court’s decision on AO’s jurisdiction and income tax appeal. Full analysis here.
Explore Geopreneur Realty Private Limited vs Union of India in Bombay High Court. Analysis of the notice under Section 148, reasons for reopening, and the court’s stance on change of opinion in income tax assessments.
Explore the recent Bombay High Court judgment in the case of Monit Trading Pvt. Ltd. against the Union of India & Others, analyzing procedural irregularities and legal nuances leading to the restoration of Monit Trading’s registration under the CGST Act, 2017.
Bombay High Court quashes GST registration cancellation order, citing lack of reasons in the show cause notice. Detailed analysis, implications, and restoration order provided.
Get insights into the recent case of Ajay Kumar Kaushal Vs State of Maharashtra in Bombay High Court. Know about the interim order and key observations.
Bombay High Court held that plea of defect in the notice cannot be accepted as it had caused no prejudice to the assessee and the assessee “clearly understood” what was the purport and import of notice issued under section 274 read with Section 271 of the Act.
The Bombay High Court recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of New India Assurance Company Limited Vs ACIT, reshaping the landscape of tax law.
Bombay High Court held that if an irrelevant matter is not struck off in the notice, it indicates the AO’s uncertainty regarding the basis for imposing the penalty. Such ambiguity implies non-application of mind, rendering the notice invalid.
