PCIT Vs Emarsso Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) The learned Counsel for the Appellant-Revenue present in Court states that Advocate who filed the appeals is no longer on the panel of the Department and they seek time to take instructions as to who will be assigned with the matter and to file vakalatnama. 2. […]
There cannot be any justification for the ONGC to withhold any amount on the premise that it has a claim of unliquidated damages against the petitioner
HC directed the respondents to open the portal to file, revise or re-revise TRAN 1 return, if it is possible or feasible.
Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) The word ‘case”’ used in Section 127-B of the Customs Act, 1962 is defined u/s 127-A(b) to mean any proceeding under this Act or any other Act for the levy, assessment and collection of customs duty, pending before an adjudicating authority on the date […]
Held that agreement would not be discharged by death of the party thereto and will be enforceable by or against the heirs of the deceased. Accordingly, present arbitration application allowed.
Held that this Court while exercising the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot entertain or adjudicate upon such issues based on additional facts not advanced earlier. Writ petition not entertained on the ground of the petitioner has not availed of alternative efficacious remedy available under section 26 of the MVAT Act.
Bombay High Court in the case of Okay Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Has allowed the revision of TRAN – 1 form on the online portal and directed the Government to open the form within 2 weeks.
This liability of GST (taxes) was certainly not in contemplation of the parties when they entered into the contract in the year 2001. MCGM who would be liable to pay the GST to the Government on a Reverse Charge basis and the same cannot be deducted from the dues payable to the Applicant.
Karanja Terminal & Logistic Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT (Bombay High Court) The principles of judicial discipline require that the orders of the higher appellate authorities should be followed unreservedly by the subordinate authorities. The mere fact that the order of the appellate authority is not acceptable to the department and is the subject matter of an […]
Section 96 read with Section 46 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 specifically exempts payment of income tax on an amount of compensation paid under the award and/or agreement. Accordingly, TDS not deductible.
