Yeshoda Electricals Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) This notice issued u/s. 148 is a manual notice and not a digital document. The digital document only does not require signature. A manual notice u/s. 148 is required to be dated and duly signed by the Officer who is issuing the same. A notice or an order without […]
Lam Research (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) It was submitted that Working capital adjustment is made for the time value of money lost when credit time is given to the customers. The Assessee however does not bear any risk and has no working capital contingencies. The Assessee has not incurred any expenses for […]
Babulal Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In cases of purchase and sale of land as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Raja J.Rameshwar Rao (supra), a decision on which the learned DR placed reliance, the intention at the time of purchase will be a relevant factor. When a person acquires land […]
Shri. Suresh Sreeram Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) It is an undisputed fact that in AY 2016-17 the partnership firm incurred heavy losses from its business and was not in a position to pay any interest on capital for the investment. Due to the poor financial condition of the partnership firm, the partners of the firm […]
Prakash Chand Bethala Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) Section 50C provides that where the consideration received or accruing as a result of transfer by an assessee of a capital asset being rent or building or both is less than the value adopted or assessed by any authority for the purpose of payment of stamp duty in […]
Prakash Chand Bethala Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the present case, the AO applied the provisions of section 50C of the Act on the basis of Sale Deed executed by the assessee on 9.3.2007. At this stage, it is appropriate to observe that there was an Agreement of Sale executed by assessee on 8.3.1993 and […]
Absence of earning any interest income on capital from the firm is no bar to claim the interest paid on borrowings for the purpose of contributing capital to the firm by the assessee as deductible expenditure.
ITAT Bangalore ruling on jewellery dispute. Assessing gold bullion, jewellery values. Assessee vs DCIT case details. Read the full judgment.
Assesse was under a bonafide belief that cash medical benefit were only reimbursement of the expenditure incurred by the employees, and as such they could not form part of their income, therefore, no tax could be recovered from the employer on account of short deduction of tax at source under section 192(1), if a bona fide estimate of salary taxable in the hands of the employee was made by the employer.
JCIT (OSD) Vs Kingfisher Airlines Limited (ITAT Bangalore) The first issue is related to disallowance of helicopter expenses. We notice that the A.O. was constrained to make adhoc disallowance since the assessee has failed to furnish details called for by the A.O. We also notice that the assessee did not appear before Ld. CIT(A) also. […]
