In re Saffron Art Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Classification of second hand or used ‘Paintings’ [Section 97(2) (a)] Answer: – The ‘Paintings are classifiable under Heading 9701 of the GST Tariff. Question 2:- Whether for determination of the liability to pay tax on the sale of second hand or used ‘Paintings’, the applicant can apply […]
In re Citi Buildcon Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the CGST Act and MGST Act’ respectively] by M/s. Citi Buildcon Private Limited, the applicant, […]
In re Rahul Ramchandran (Inspire Academy) (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1: – Whether ‘Nashik Cambridge Pre-School’ is covered under Notification No. 12/2017-CT, dated 28th June, 2017 SI No. 66, under the Heading 9992 under GST Act Answer:- Answered in the affirmative. Question 2:- Whether Nashik Cambridge Pre-school is entitled for Nil rate of tax as per Serial […]
In re Baroda Medicare Private Limited (GST AAAR Gujarat) The issue raised by the appellant in the present case is whether the supply of Occupational Health Check – up service by the hospital i.e. nursing staff, doctors, paramedical staff on hospital’s payroll, working in different corporate for providing health check-up service, ambulance facility, and allied […]
Appellant’s shop in SHA cannot by any stretch of imagination be said to be located outside India. Instead, we find that the appellant’s shop is located within India, as defined under s2(56) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with s2 (27) of the Customs Act, 1962.
In re Deepak & Co. (GST AAAR Delhi) The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling passed the following order: 1. The GST rate on supply of food and/or drinks by the appellant whether in trains or at platforms (static units), will be 5% without ITC. 2. In respect of supply of newspapers, the same are exempted under […]
AAAR, Delhi in In re Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs held that the delay in filing an appeal beyond prescribed limit can’t be condoned
In re Baroda Medicare Private Limited (GST AAAR Gujarat) AAAR held that supply of Occupation Health Checkup Service by the hospital i.e. nursing staff, Doctors, Paramedical staff on hospital’s payroll working in different corporate for providing health check-up services, ambulance facility and allied medical services to their employees and also the camps conducted for health […]
In re Anshul Life Sciences (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR rule that pea protein merit classification under subheading 21061000 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI M/s. Anshul Life Sciences, 401, 4th Floor, Jagdamba House, Peru Baug, Goregaon East, Mumbai- 400063 filed an […]
In re Frizwell Agro Foods (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that the dehydrated dark and small seedless raisin (Vitis vinifera) merit classification under subheading 08062010 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and are eligible for exemption benefit allowed under sr. no. 32 of notification no. 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017. FULL TEXT OF ORDER […]
