Ravi Dixit Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the summoning order is without compliance of provisions of Section 138 of the Act, 1881; the application has been falsely implicated due to enmity and financial dispute with the complainant and that cheques were dishonoured as […]
After considering all the arguments advanced by the parties and the judgments relied upon by the parties and further considering to the nature of offence, its gravity and the evidence in support of it and the overall circumstances of this case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has not made out a case for bail.
Mayank Sikarwar Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) The petitioner had a registration under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which when the Assessing Authority cancelled on 19.9.2019 under Section 29(2)(c) of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act), the petitioner filed an application for the revocation of […]
Anticipatory Bail Granted against GST Evasion by considering Clean Criminal History of Applicant along with furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties.
Addition under section 68 for not proving the source of income of partners who have made the deposit with the firm in their capital account could not be made as partners had shown the agricultural income in their personal returns of the past years which had been accepted by the department as such and the partners were all identifiable and separately assessed to tax thus, the source of investment having been explained and therefore, the addition could not have to be considered in the hands of the partners and not in the hands of the firm.
As per Section 10(23AA), the exemption can be for the income received by any person on behalf of any regimental fund or non-public fund established by the armed forces of the Union for the welfare of the past and present members.
Bbooks of accounts were duly presented when the show cause notice was given to the assessee, and no discrepancy was found in the same, but non-presentation of the books of accounts at the time of survey cannot be the sole reason for rejection of the books of accounts.
All interim orders passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad as well as at Lucknow, all the District Courts, Civil Courts,Family Courts, Labour Courts, Industrial Tribunals and all other Tribunals in the State over which this Court has power of superintendence, which have been expired subsequent to 19th March, 2020 or are due to expire within a period of one month from today, will continue to operate upto 26th April, 2020. We, however, make it clear that those interim orders which are not of a limited duration and are to operate till further orders will remain unaffected;
Additions of Undisclosed Income Can be made only on the basis of the entries made in the documents which give corroborative evidence and not just on presumption
Darpan Sahu Vs State Of U.P. (Allahabad high Court) Allahabad High Court stays all recoveries/coercive action of any kind for two weeks to ensure no filing takes places till 6.4.2020. Today, there is an extraordinary situation in the country due to pandemic Corona Virus and therefore, it calls for an extraordinary measure to be taken […]
