Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gaurav Trading Company Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Tax No. 319 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 06/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gaurav Trading Company Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court)

This Court finds that by ex parte order the first appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed as he has failed to appear before the authority on 6.4.2021, 24.9.2021 and 2.11.2021. Taking a lenient view, this Court directs the Appellate Authority to reconsider the appeal of the petitioner on merits after hearing the counsel for the petitioner and decide the same within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. This Court further directs that the petitioner’s counsel shall remain present on the date fixed by the First Appellate Authority and shall argue the matter on merits.

FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.C. Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State.

The petitioner before this Court, who was registered under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 2017), was issued a show cause notice for cancellation of registration on 27th November, 2020. The said notice remained unreplied by the petitioner, pursuant to which the order for cancellation of registration was passed by the Taxing Authority on 7.12.2020. An application for revocation of cancellation of registration was preferred by the petitioner but the same was rejected by order dated 26.4.2021. Aggrieved by the order of rejection of the application for revocation of cancellation of registration, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the First Appellate Authority. The First Appellate Authority on 17.11.2021 has rejected the appeal on the ground that the counsel for the petitioner on three dates has not appeared and pressed the appeal and in view of Section 107(9) of the Act of 2017 only three adjournments can be granted and thereafter the First Appellate Authority proceeded to pass an ex parte order rejecting the application.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031