Allahabad HC directs Amazing Security Services Pvt Ltd to file a bail application in a criminal case related to GST payment.
Allahabad HC rules a human error in GST e-way bill does not imply tax evasion, quashing penalties against Uttam Electric Store.
Allahabad HC upholds tax and penalty on Anil Rice Mill for wrong ITC claims under GST, emphasizing the burden of proof lies on the purchaser.
Allahabad High Court directs Bushrah Export House to appeal against refund denial under CGST Act, despite delays and ongoing special appeal.
Allahabad HC sets aside U.P. GST order for BGR Energy. The court mandates a fresh hearing due to procedural issues and insolvency resolution.
Allahabad High Court rules no penalty for human error in E-Way bill. Case details and legal context in Uttam Electric Store vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad High Court’s decision: Appeals should be dismissed in default if the appellant or their lawyer is absent, not decided on merits.
Discover the Allahabad High Court’s ruling on Nancy Trading Company Vs State of U.P. And 3 Others, stating that not generating an e-invoice doesn’t imply tax evasion.
Read the detailed analysis of Kashi Ram Ved Prakash v. Commissioner of Commercial Tax U.P. by Allahabad High Court. The court discusses liability under UP Trade Tax Act and refund implications.
When it’s established as a legal principle that an assessee isn’t obligated to request a ‘personal hearing,’ the Assessing Authority must still provide this opportunity before making an adverse order. Therefore, marking ‘No’ in the personal hearing choice holds no legal consequence.
