Explore the case of Popular Vehicles and Services Ltd. vs Commissioner of Central Tax & Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore). Analysis of service tax demand on free services and warranty labor, with references to legal precedents and departmental decisions.
Explore the case of Solvay Specialities India Pvt Ltd vs C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-II (CESTAT Ahmedabad). Detailed analysis of Cenvat Credit eligibility for Group Insurance Services, referencing legal precedents and judicial interpretations.
Fidelity Business Services India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Photography Services were availed by the appellant for capturing the business events which are necessary to keep record of the events conducted as well as for future reference hence this service also falls within the definition of Input Service. Further, with regard […]
Ace Creative Learning Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore) Appellant is providing Commercial Training and Coaching Services and they have also invested in the mutual funds and have earned profit during the year 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 which they have shown as under the head ‘other income’. The Department has wrongly considered […]
Sky Alloys & Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner (CESTAT Delhi) FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT DELHI ORDER The appellant M/s Sky Alloys & Power Pvt. Ltd. are engaged in manufacture of Sponge Iron, MS Ingots and Silico Manganese. Their premises were got searched on 7 November 2015 and 8 November 2015 by the team of Preventive […]
Trimble Information Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of G.S.T. and Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) With regard to Membership Subscription, it is the case of the assessee that being part of a multi-national company, the appellant is required to subscribe to various business magazines and register as a member with various business associations for promoting […]
CESTAT Delhi sets aside demand based on third-party evidence. Adjudicating Authority warned on compliance. Read the full judgment details.
Discover the implications of Section 1(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 in the case of Seville Products Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs, Ludhiana. Uncover why the CESTAT Chandigarh sets aside the penalty imposed on an appellant located outside India.
Baldeep Singh Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Delhi) In the present case inspite of opportunity given, Revenue failed to produce the proof of delivery of the show cause notice. Further, from perusal of the order-in-original, I find that the Adjudicating Authority have not recorded satisfaction of service of show cause notice and have proceeded to […]
Get insights on Cenvat credit availability for workmen compensation insurance policy. Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad order and legal perspectives on the matter.
