Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Seville Products Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 60438 of 2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 08/04/2021
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Seville Products Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs, Ludhiana (CESTAT Chandigarh)

Section 1, sub section (2) of the Customs Act, 1962 admittedly is having jurisdiction in only within whole of India and its territories and cannot be extended beyond India and the appellant is located outside of India, therefore, no penalty can be imposed on the appellant under Customs Act, 1962, therefore, I do not find any merit in the impugned order, the same is set aside.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT CHANDIGARH ORDER

The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein penalty of Rs. 1 lakh has been imposed on the appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962.

2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is located in Dubai, outside of India and having no office in India. He is supplying confectionary items to various importers of India. A case has been booked against one of the importer M/s Royal Import & Export on account of under valuation by DRI. A show cause notice was issued by DRI on 11.08.2014 to impose penalty on the appellant. A penalty of Rs. 1 lakh was imposed on the appellant under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. Against the said order, the appellant is before me.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031