Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Mumbai’s decision to quash a show cause notice with contradictory statements in Maheshwari Transport vs. Commissioner of CE & ST case.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in Madhu Silica Pvt Ltd Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad that proper inquiry is required for classifying Malvern Master Sizer under Customs Tariff.
CESTAT Bangalore held that top gas is refuse like dross and skimmings which are merely scum thrown out in the manufacture of aluminium sheets and have been held not to be “manufactured” goods.
CESTAT Kolkata held that onus cast on appellant u/s 123 not having been discharged, hence concluded that contraband gold smuggled from a third country of origin is liable to absolute confiscation.
Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad’s ruling in Mentor Graphics India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Tax Hyderabad regarding Cenvat credit eligibility for input services.
Analysis of the CESTAT Chennai ruling in Paper and Allied Conversions vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, focusing on service tax on reimbursable expenses.
Explore the legal implications of MGF Motors Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise on the non-imposition of service tax for free car repairs under warranty.
In Mars Mountain Security Services vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, CESTAT Kolkata clarified non-taxability of Man-Power services before June 16, 2005.
CESTAT Bangalore allows a timber import company to refund customs and special additional duty on unsold goods, providing a key precedent for the industry.
Spent earth (By-Product)arising in oil refining, bleaching process arising is not liable to Excise duty -Awn Agro P Ltd Vs C.C.E. & S.T. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
