CESTAT Chennai sets aside revocation of Customs Broker license for Souparnika Shipping Services due to facilitating fraudulent import-export activities.
CESTAT Allahabad rules against service tax demand based solely on Form 26AS, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence beyond income tax returns.
CESTAT Chandigarh orders 12% annual interest on excise duty refunds for Fujikawa Power vs CCE & ST, setting a precedent for timely financial compensations.
CESTAT Kolkata rules no penalty on Rakesh Aggarwal without evidence of involvement in invalid BMW M5 importation. Detailed analysis and verdict explained.
In the case of World Line Cargo Movers Vs Commissioner of Customs, CESTAT Delhi ruled that customs brokers cannot be held liable for background checks of clients.
Read how CESTAT Chandigarh directs release of seized imported garlic on furnishing bond and bank guarantee covering the demand of differential duty. Legal analysis and implications provided.
CESTAT ruling favors Samarth Corporation, negating Customs’ demand for interest and penalties over bond non-furnishing under amended notification.
CESTAT Kolkata rules in favor of UCO Bank, allowing Cenvat credit for service tax paid on telephone bills for employee residences. Details of the case here.
A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs: CESTAT orders release of HMS scrap after mutilation under customs supervision.
Read about CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling confirming separate classification for software licenses and software, allowing the benefit of nil customs duty rate.
