Learn from CESTAT Bangalore’s ruling that a duty-free shop licensee must pay customs duty when violating Customs Act provisions. Analysis & implications explained.
CESTAT Bangalore rules reimbursable expenses not includable in taxable value for services under warranty, setting precedent for service tax assessments.
CESTAT Bangalore sets aside differential duty in Hazel Mercantile Ltd. vs Commissioner of Customs case, emphasizing no demand on undervaluation due to higher discount on import.
CESTAT Bangalore nullifies Rs. 1,00,000 penalty on B.K. Manjunath under Customs Act Section 114(1) due to lack of evidence in illegal export allegation.
CESTAT Ahmedabad emphasizes the importance of evidence in rejecting bill of entry values in Deeplalit Enterprise P Ltd Vs C.C.-Ahmedabad case.
CESTAT Bangalore clarifies that the ‘Let Export Order’ date is crucial for determining the customs duty rate on exports, impacting refund claims.
CESTAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minebea Intec, waiving customs penalty post voluntary duty payment before SCN issuance. Detailed insights here.
CESTAT Bangalore rules against UDL Logistics for not verifying exporter’s rep, imposing penalty. Full analysis of the case provided.
CESTAT Ahmedabad rules in Asia Shipping Services vs. C.C.-Kandla case, dropping penalty for dual CHA licenses due to procedural lapses. Detailed analysis provided.
CESTAT Chennai clarifies the application of Section 27(1B) limitation for refund claims on duty paid under protest, aligning with legal precedents.
