Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Customs Appeal No. 1926 of 2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore)

Introduction: A.P. Steel Re-Rolling Mills Ltd. faced a challenge regarding the classification of imported Heavy Metal Scrap (HMS) by the Commissioner of Customs. The dispute arose when the examination revealed that the goods were of assorted sizes, not fitting the definition of HMS scrap.

Detailed Analysis: The appellant contended that the imported goods met the criteria for HMS scrap, as evidenced by documents such as sale contracts, invoices, and pre-shipment certificates. They argued that the goods were suitable for melting purposes only, consistent with the import policy.

The adjudicating authority, however, rejected the appellant’s request for release or mutilation of the goods, proposing confiscation and imposing fines. On appeal, the Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision.

During the appeal before CESTAT Bangalore, the appellant presented evidence to support their claim, including documentation and relevant case law. They emphasized that the goods were imported in compliance with the import policy and were certified as scrap by accredited agencies.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031