Double taxation for same service activity is not legally permissible: CESTAT Chennai ruling – Learn about CESTAT Chennai verdict forbidding double taxation for services, as per the Finance Act of 1994.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on ‘Boron Ore’ customs duty exemption under Customs Notification No. 15/2017-CUS. Analysis of the case, legal arguments, and the decision to remand to the Adjudicating Authority for reevaluation. Stay informed on the latest developments in customs regulations.
CESTAT Bangalore held that destruction of obsolete goods allowed to EOU on payment of duty on scrap value. Accordingly, held that when goods are destroyed EOU is not liable to pay duty on original value at the time of import.
In a significant decision, CESTAT Mumbai quashes customs duty demand on the export of polyurethane polyvinyl chloride soles of footwear, citing the absence of malafide intention. Explore the full text of the CESTAT order, key facts, and the legal analysis leading to the conclusion.
CENVAT credit denied: CESTAT directed re-adjudication based on ISD invoices mentioning Mumbai address & not related to manufacturing activities.
Analysis of CESTAT Chandigarh’s order in Panacea Biotec Ltd. vs Commissioner, quashing excise duty demand on Hemophilus Vaccine due to absence of real manufacturer.
Champion Flavours vs Commissioner CGST: CESTAT Chandigarh rules on interest for delayed service tax refund under Section 11BB, citing legal precedents.
Explore the crucial CESTAT Mumbai ruling in Tata AIG vs. Commissioner of Service Tax. Learn why denying CENVAT credit without assessing service providers is deemed unsustainable. In-depth analysis, legal insights, and the impact on general insurance services.
Read the comprehensive analysis of the CESTAT Delhi order where the Commissioner (Appeals) upholds the service tax refund claim by Mobinteco Ltd. The decision revolves around the non-violation of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, offering insights into the intricacies of service tax provisions and relevant dates for refund claims. Get a detailed understanding of the case, the arguments presented, and the implications for similar situations.
In a landmark decision, CESTAT Mumbai rules in favor of Lear Automotive (India) Pvt Ltd, directing re-adjudication for the recovery of CENVAT credit related to epoxy moulds. Full text analysis included.
