In the scenario of the license for renting of immovable property has expired and not in force but the licensee continues to be in Possession and occupation of the immovable properties , in cases where there is a provision in contract for continued supply of service after expiry or termination of the contract, the Rent Claim Advice is issued by the applicant with the period prescribed in Section 31(5) and the Time of supply as determined by Section 13(2)(a), as the earliest of the date of issue of Rent Claim Advice by the supplier and the date of receipt of payment.
Murali Mogan (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Tamarind supplied by the applicant which has not undergone the process of direct drying in sun or by industrial process is classifiable under CTH 08109020.
Medicines, consumables and implants used in the course of providing health care services to in-patients by the applicant is a composite supply of Inpatient Services classifiable under SAC 999311.
Waters with added carbon dioxide which may contain added preservatives and flavoring , sugars are separately classified under Para 2.10.6 as Carbonated Water’ and Category 14.1.1.2 as ‘table waters and soda waters’ which are different from ‘Carbonated Fruit Beverages or Fruit Drinks’ of Para 2.3.30 and Category ‘14.1.4.1’ of FSSAI regulations.
The rate of GST applicable on a supply made by the applicant of desktops consisting together of CPU, monitor, keyboard and mouse classifiable under CTH 8471 is taxable @ 9% CGST as per Notification No. 01/2017-C.T. (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 & 9% -SGST under Notification No.II (2)/CTR/532(d-14)/2017 vide G.O. (Ms) No. 72 dated 29.06.2017 as amended if all the units are supplied together with the CPU in a single supply.
Applicant has stated that it is absolutely clear that one cannot invoice as terming Edible copra as its edibility is challenged and it is also clear that HS Code 1203 Copra is meant only for Milling copra (refer HSN Explanatory notes) and their commodity falls under HSN Code 08011920 only
The applicant vide their letter dated 26th August 2019 has submitted that they wish to voluntarily and unconditionally withdraw the advance ruling application as the CBIC circular No.107/26/2019-GST dated 18.07.2019 has provided clarity to the ambiguity for which they had sought the Advance Ruling.
In re A.M. Abdul Rahman Rowther & Co (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The issue raised by the applicant is the classification of the product manufactured by them and the applicability of Notification No.01/2017 Comp.Cess (Rate). From the comments furnished by the Commissioner GST 86 Central Excise, Trichy, it is seen that the proceedings in respect of […]
In re Malli Ramalingam Mothilal (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) Lower authority has held that the commodity manufactured by the appellant is a braided yarn made using a braiding machine and classified the Product under `CTH 5607- Twine, cordage, Ropes and cables, whether or not plaited or braided and whether or not impregnated, coated, covered or sheathed […]
In re Chinnakani Arumuga Selvaraja, Proprietor of M/s Sri Venkateshwara Traders (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The product ‘Cattle feed in cake form’ manufactured by the Applicant is classifiable under Chapter Heading 23099010 and stands exempted as per vide Sl.No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28th June 2017 as amended and Sl.No. 102 of Notification. […]
