In re NHPC Ltd. (GST AAAR Uttarakhand) Members of Uttarakhand Advance Ruling authority have different view on the applicability of GST on the sub-contractor so they made a reference to the appellate authority for hearing and discussion. Appellate authority in the case that whether the exemption available for PWD Uttarakhand and M/s NHPC Ltd, can […]
In re Sumeet Facilities Limited (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) The case laws and arguments pertaining to Service Tax law are specific to that law as there were provisions catering specifically to subcontractors whereas in GST the provisions are very restricted. Exemption benefit are not available to sub-contractors ex facie since those entries under 12/2017 specific to […]
In re Erode Infrastructures Private Limited (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) The appellant has mainly harped on the wordings of Section 97(2)(d) of the GST Act, on the ground that since admissibility of ITC paid or deemed to have been paid can be sought as a question for obtaining advance ruling, in as much as that unless […]
In re Tvl. Padmavathi Hospitality & Facilities Management Service (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) The Order of the Advance Ruling Authority was right, since at the material time there was a petition filed by the appellant, pending before the Hon’ble High Court in this matter. Therefore, there is no need to interfere with the order of the […]
In re Chennai Metro Rail Ltd. (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) In this case entire land had been acquired by the appellant and the same had been acquired for business purposes only. The appellant after acquisition of the land had granted shared- access to the pathway with no grant of right of occupation and possession and the […]
The activity of wet-leasing is squarely classifiable under SAC 9973 Leasing or rental services with or without operator as held by the LA and we uphold the same. Therefore the benefit of entry at 3(v)(a) of Notification No. 11/2017-C.T.(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not applicable in respect of Wet-Leasing of the M&Ps.
In re Soft turf (GST AAAR Kerala) AAAR held that impugned goads viz. PVC carpet Mat would fall in the Customs Tariff heading 3918 and applicable rate of GST would be 18% (9% each of CGST and SGST). However, this order is restricted to the types of PVC floor coverings/Carpet/Mats being manufactured by the Applicant […]
In re Santhosh Distributors Kottayam (GST AAAR Kerala) 1. Whether the discount provided by the M/s Castrol to their dealers through the appellant attracts any tax under GST ? Yes, the additional discount reimbursed by M/s Castrol, is liable to be added to the consideration payable by the customers or dealers to the appellant. The […]
In re Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft ZurForderung der angewandten Forschung (GST AAAR Karnataka) Since the parent company in Germany and the Appellant in India cannot be treated as separate persons but as one legal entity, the liaison activity performed by the Appellant for the parent company is in the nature of a service rendered to self A service […]
In re Nepra Resource Management Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) As the appellant has not been providing services to the Central Government, State Government or Union Territory or local authority or a Governmental authority or a Government Entity, the benefit of Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not […]
