In re SPX Flow Technology India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Gujarat) In view of the foregoing, the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/102/2020 dated 14.10.2020 is confirmed to the extent it has been appeal against, by holding that the Integrated Goods and Services Tax was payable by the appellant M/s. SPX Flow Technology (India) Pvt. Ltd. from […]
In re M/s. Rajivkumar Giriraj Bansal (Proprietor of M/s. Gujarat Plast Industries) (GST AAAR Gujarat) The product narrow woven fabric of Polypropylene yarn of width not exceeding 30 cms provided with selvedges on both edges manufactured by the appellant merit classification under Tariff heading No. 58063990 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, attracting rate of […]
AAAR modified the ruling passed by the AAR, Gujarat and held that, supply of installation/up-gradation of machines and training services for and on behalf of the Company located outside India, by the supplier in India will not fall under the definition of ‘intermediary’.
In re Barkatbhai Noordinbhai Velani (M/s. Alisha Gruh Udyog) The product ‘fried – different shapes and sizes Papad’ involved in the present case merit classification under Custom Tariff heading (CTH) No. 19059040 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and chargeable to 18% rate of Goods and Services Tax as per Sl. No. 16 of Schedule-III […]
The word ‘per unit of accommodation’ should be understood as per general practice adopted by large number of service provider in similar business model. In hotels, generally it fixes per room, per suit whereas in hostels, inns and dharmshalas, it fixes per room, per bed, per seat and per person. From the facts mentioned by the appellant, it would emerge that they provides accommodation service in hostel and fix the tariff on the basis of hostel seat, therefore, we agreed the contention of appellant and finds that hostel seat should be considered as a unit of accommodation.
In re Unique Aqua Systems (GST AAAR Tamilnadu) The issue is not answered and is deemed to be that no ruling is issued under Section 101(3) of CGST/TNGST Act 2017 because of the difference of opinion between the members. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF APPELLATE ADVANCE RULING,TAMILNADU At the outset, we would like […]
In re Lucknow Producers Co-operative Milk Union Ltd (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) In this case appellant himself admitted that appellant is not covered under the reverse charge mechanism, but they are paying the entire tax to the service provider. In view of this, we find that, the appellant is a recipient of services in the […]
In re Educational Initiative Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) In view of the foregoing discussion, we allow the appeal filed by the department, modify the Advance Ruling No. GUJ/GAAR/R/27/2020 dated 02.07.2020 of the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling and hold that ASSET (Assessment of Scholastic Skills through Educational Testing – with its variants) conducted by […]
In re BEML Limited (GST AAAR Karnataka) In the instant case, there is no doubt that there are multiple supplies of both goods and services being undertaken as part of this contract. While the supply from Cost Centre C is a supply of goods i.e the Standard Gauge Intermediate Cars, the supply by Cost Centre […]
In re J K Papad Industries (GST AAAR Gujarat) Appellant has obtained the Advance Ruling by submitting application of advance ruling with suppression of material facts or misrepresentation of facts, and the application was not eligible to be admitted in view of proviso to sub-section (2) of section 98 of the CGST Act, 2017. Therefore, […]
