Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Article analyses the IBC (Amendment) Act, 2026, covering creditor-driven reforms, CIIRP, liquidation, avoidance actions and cross-...
Corporate Law : A detailed guide to LLP incorporation covering RUN-LLP, Form FILLIP, Form LLP-3, required documents, CRC approval and post-incorpo...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC quashed demolition proceedings, adopted Supreme Court directions, and issued further directions governing demolition ...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC examined criminal cases against advocates, Bar Council processes, verification issues, and issued compliance directio...
Corporate Law : Explains extra-judicial killings, constitutional and statutory provisions, Supreme Court guidelines and the legal framework govern...
Corporate Law : Government outlines FTAs, Export Promotion Mission, e-commerce export reforms and logistics initiatives to diversify export market...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry states ED is investigating under PMLA, has attached ₹68.09 crore in properties and shared information with Biha...
Corporate Law : Finance Ministry outlines CBDT e-Filing portal upgrades, peak filing readiness and contractual penalties imposed on the Managed Se...
Corporate Law : CCPA begins action against 41 restaurants over default service charges, citing consumer complaints, 2022 Guidelines and the Consum...
Corporate Law : CBI filed its 16th chargesheet in a homebuyers fraud investigation alleging conspiracy, cheating and criminal breach of trust invo...
Corporate Law : CCPA ordered removal of default service charge from billing software, imposed a ₹30,000 penalty, and directed compliance within ...
Corporate Law : CCPA directed immediate discontinuation of service charge, noting the restaurant stopped the practice after the Delhi HC judgment ...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty for misleading walkie-talkie listings lacking mandatory disclosures and directed future complian...
Corporate Law : CCPA imposed a ₹1 lakh penalty for misleading walkie-talkie advertisements lacking mandatory regulatory disclosures and directed...
Corporate Law : CCI closed proceedings after finding no prima facie evidence of input foreclosure, denial of market access, or abuse of dominance ...
Corporate Law : Bill introduced in Lok Sabha proposes increasing Supreme Court Judges from 33 to 37, replacing the 2026 Ordinance with retrospecti...
Corporate Law : BCI directs State Bar Councils and law colleges to immediately implement its Circular on social media conduct, digital ethics and ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an Insolvency Professional's registration over CIRP compliance lapses, disclosure failures and Code violations in t...
Corporate Law : FSSAI amends the notified food laboratory list, updating accredited laboratories, registrations and scopes across multiple States ...
Corporate Law : PFRDA notifies Regulatory Sandbox Regulations, 2026 enabling controlled testing with limited relaxations while protecting subscrib...
The court set aside an adjudication order after finding that the confirmed demand far exceeded the amount proposed in the notice. The ruling reiterates that authorities cannot travel beyond the show cause notice while adjudicating.
The Court examined whether the stringent twin conditions for bail under the PMLA applied to a woman accused in a money laundering case. Holding that the statutory proviso applied, the Court granted bail, emphasizing delayed proceedings and completed investigation.
The appellate tribunal held that a date discrepancy in the possession notice was a harmless typographical error. It ruled that SARFAESI procedures were substantially complied with and restored the bank’s recovery action.
The tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that repeated failure to file written statements despite ample opportunity validates ex-parte recovery orders.
The appellate tribunal held that the bank had duly served, published, and affixed the sale notice as required under Rule 8(6). It ruled that the DRT erred in cancelling the auction despite full statutory compliance.
The appellate tribunal upheld the award of 9% interest on refund to an auction purchaser, holding that statutory violations by the bank’s authorised officer justified compensation despite a no-interest clause.
The appellate tribunal held that the magistrate had lawfully exercised powers under Section 14 after considering the statutory affidavit. The DRT’s restraint on recovery action was found to be contrary to law and was set aside.
The appellate tribunal held that the bank violated Rule 8(5) by conducting the auction nearly ten months after valuation without obtaining a fresh report. The sale and subsequent actions were set aside on this ground.
The tribunal held that objections to the maintainability of a bank’s Original Application claiming over Rs. 50 crores were rejected, affirming DRT jurisdiction over debts arising from fraudulent withdrawals.
The appellate tribunal upheld cancellation of the auction after finding that possession and sale notices were not properly served. It ruled that recovery actions without statutory compliance cannot be sustained.
