This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Likelihood of confusion among public essential for refusal of Trademark Registration U/s. 11
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- RSPL Health Private Limited Vs Reckitt And Colman (Overseas) Hygiene Home Limited &ANR (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
RSPL Health Private Limited Vs Reckitt And Colman (Overseas) Hygiene Home Limited & ANR (Delhi High Court)
Conclusion: The Hon’ble High Court observed that for refusal of Registration under Section 11 of the Trademarks Act, it would have to be shown that the marks themselves are confusingly similar to each other, and that, owing to the similarity in the marks and the goods and services which they cover, there is a likelihood of confusion among the public, or a likelihood of the public believing the existence of an association between the marks.
Facts: In present facts of...
Author Info
