This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Share application money didn’t constitute financial debt u/s. 5(8) of IBC: NCLAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Murlidhar Vincom Pvt. Ltd. Vs Skoda (India) Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- NCLAT
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Murlidhar Vincom Pvt. Ltd. Vs Skoda (India) Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)
NCLAT Delhi held that the amount given as share application money did not constitute a financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC). Thus, CIRP application u/s. 7 rightly rejected.
Facts- The present appeal filed under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 by the Appellant arises out of the Order dated 22.03.2024 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi, Bench-VI) in CP (IB) No. 554 of 2023. By the impugned order, the Adjud...
Author Info
