Social Audit Standards (SAS) 1100
Slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities
(SAS 1100 should be read in conjunction with the “Preface to the Social Audit Standards” and
“Framework for the Social Audit Standards”, issued by the ICAI)
SECTION I – INTRODUCTION
Objective and Scope
1.10 This Social Audit Standard relates to the thematic area of “Slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities”. The Standard aims to provide the Social Auditor with the necessary guidance about independent impact assessment engagement of Social Enterprises engaged in promoting slum area development, affordable housing, and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities and the audit steps and procedures that should be applied while conducting the social impact assessment. The Standard sets out the minimum requirements to be followed while conducting impact assessment. Laws or Regulations may establish additional requirements which should be followed as applicable.
SECTION II – PROCESS OF SOCIAL AUDIT
Data Collection
1.20 The stakeholders that may be approached for obtaining data include:
> Direct beneficiaries e.g., slum dwellers, users of public transport system particularly women students, older people, people with disabilities etc, resident welfare associations, communities for solid and liquid waste management etc.
> Government’s ministries and public welfare departments
> Local chambers of commerce
> Real estate associations
> Central and state level monitoring agencies
> Key program officials of the reporting entity
The overall activity of conducting a survey and collecting sample data should be reviewed in terms of the following factors to assess relevance and reliability:
> Designed by an in-house team or external specialized agency
> Conducted by an in-house team or external specialized agency
> Coverage: number of slums/districts/ total distance (kms) covered/modes and availability of transport system / techniques used for waste management
Desk Review
1.30 The Social Auditor should conduct a desk review of existing documents to gain further insight into the evaluation procedure and impact assessment. Before doing the desktop review the Social Auditor may visit the targeted slums or affordable housings to get an understanding of the ground issues and challenges. Such documents, about slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities may include the following:
General Documents
Social Audit Standards
1.40 Besides desk review, the Social Auditor should also consider conducting physical inspection and personal interviews to get first hand assessment of impact.
Evaluation Questions
1.50 The Social Auditor should review the evaluation questions addressed through Questionnaires, In-depth interviews, and Focused Group Discussions to assess the responses received from various stakeholders and to understand what has changed. This would help the Social Auditor in forming his views on the following aspects:
Such questions, in relation to slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities, may cover the following aspects:
(a) Composition of the participants
(b) Standard of living
(c) Affordable housing, transportation, waste management
(d) Socio-economic factors
(e) Suggestions / Feedback
Social Audit Standards
Key Metrics for Evaluation of Project/ Program
1.60 The Social Auditor should review the project/ program documents to frame the evaluation criteria for assessing impact. Such key metrics may be collated from base-line, mid-line (monthly/quarterly) and end-line assessment (if available), respectively at the beginning, middle and end of the reporting period/ project/ program to effectively understand and evaluate the impact.
The evaluation of the project/ program information would facilitate the Social Auditor to assess:
Such information, about promoting slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities, may include the following points in respect of the beneficiaries covered under the survey:
(a) Composition of the participants
(b) Standard of living
(c) Affordable housing, transportation waste management
(d) Socio-economic factors
(e) Other Factors
Assessment of Evaluation Criteria (Illustrative Key Performance Indicators)
1.70 The Social Auditor should identify the quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria against which the impact has to be assessed.
Such criteria for promoting slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities may broadly include any of the following aspects:
Social Audit Standards
S. No |
Evaluation Criteria |
(A) | Quantitative Criteria |
1 | Housing and Infrastructure
a) Percentage of houses which are kutcha b) Percentage of houses which are semi pucca c) Percentage of households not covered with piped water supply d) Percentage of households not covered with individual toilets e) Percentage of length not covered with pucca drains f) Percentage deficiency of pucca road, narrow access (<3m) g) Percentage of road length without streetlights h) Percentage of households without access to facilities of disposal of solid waste |
2 | Project beneficiaries
a) No. of beneficiaries from deprived/disadvantaged sections of society, rural or backward areas to total beneficiaries b) The number of people evicted in the largest mass eviction that took place in the greater municipality in the last three years c) The percentage of people who were resettled or given compensation roughly equivalent to the value of their homes (%) d) Number of beneficiaries from economically weaker section, scheduled cast and scheduled tribes |
3 | Housing ownership, eviction and resettlement
a) Number of women owning the affordable houses b) Rooms per person, overcrowding rate, housing depriving rate c) Estimated percent of all the properties in the municipality that have their title properly registered d) Number of households living in informal settlements in the greater municipality e) Number of households living in informal settlements in the greater municipality who have titles provided by a regularization program f) The number of people evicted in the largest mass eviction that took place in the greater municipality in the last three years g) Was violence involved in eviction? h) The percentage of people who were resettled or given compensation roughly equivalent to the value of their homes |
3 | Income ratios
a) House price to income ratio b) Rental cost to income ratio |
4 | Means of housing financing and Government subsidies
a) The inflation rate last year (%) b) Residential mortgage debt as percentage of GDP c) Interest rates and mortgage availability d) Availability of low-cost home ownership products e) Is loan available for both newly built and existing houses? f) Availability of market value home ownership product g) Are there housing loans given at subsidized interest rates? h) Indicate the percentage of the housing loans lending portfolio that is in default (60 days past due) |
5 | Infrastructure services
Water and electricity services a) Most recent data on the percentage of the urban population in the country with access to improved water supply b) How many hours a day, on average, is water available in pipes in slums or housing settlements? c) Percent of urban population with improved sanitation d) The percentage of paved roads in the area e) The average time of the journey to work by all modes in the city f) Number of days last year that the roads in the city were flooded g) Percent of urban dwelling units with electrical connection h) Number of hours per day that electricity is available in a typical low-income settlement in the city Police and fire protection a) The share of the area of the city in neighbourhoods that are regularly patrolled by the police b) Number of murders per 1,000 people in the city last year c) Is there adequate fire protection in all neighbourhoods? Transport system a) The estimated percentage of the city within 10-minute walking distance of a public transit (bus or rail) stop b) Estimated percentage of commuters who walk to work c) Estimated percentage of journey to- work trips in the city and its environs by public transport, mini-buses and other non-private transport, excluding walking trips Garbage collection and waste management a) Percentage of the city with regular public garbage collection b) How many times a week, on average, is garbage collected from households in high-income in the city? c) How many times a week, on average, is garbage collected from households in low-income in the city? d) Percent of garbage disposed in sanitary landfills e) Percentage of wards with 100% door to door waste collection f) Percentage of individual household toilets constructed against target g) Percentage of wards with 100% source segregation h) Installed sewage treatment capacity as a percentage of sewage generated in urban areas i) Percentage of urban households with drainage facility Access to education and health care is adequate in the city a) What is the average travel time in minutes to the nearest primary school from low-income communities? b) What is the average travel time from low-income neighbourhoods to the nearest health care centre or medical facility? |
6 | Safety and comfort
a) Number of Safety- incidence of crime b) Presence of environmental problems c) Number of fatal accidents on roads |
7 | Energy efficiency of housing
a) Percentage of households electrified b) Percentage of LPG+PNG connections against number of households c) Cost of energy to average income of the beneficiaries d) Percentage of MSW processed to the total MSW generated |
(B) | Qualitative Criteria |
1 | Improvement in standard of living–
Change in standard of living of beneficiaries and have better facilities. The following indicators may be used to assess the same: a) Ownership of house b) Availability of water, electricity, and sanitation facilities c) Family size and household density d) Facilities and services
|
2 | Improvement in Social conditions – Improvement in social status and social acceptance, social prestige among neighbours, gaining respect in the society. |
3 | Improvement in Health conditions
The following indicators may be used to assess the same: a) Availability of potable water at home c) Availability of sanitation facility c) Satisfaction with the availability of good, healthcare facilities at affordable price |
4 | Improvement in living standards
The following indicators may be used to assess whether: a) Program helped the slum dwellers have access to constructed house b) The beneficiaries influenced others c) Quality of neighbourhood d) Is there a process or program to recognize occupancy of public land? For example, certificates of occupancy, street addressing, or other official documents are given to informal settlers. e) Is the occupation of public land permissible? f) Is there a process or program to recognize occupancy of public land? For example, certificates of occupancy, street addressing, or other official documents are given to informal settlers. g) How long in advance of the actual eviction were people first informed? h) Any subsidies provided by government for water supply or energy distribution i) Provision for garbage collection from the colony and cleanliness of roads |
SECTION III – ASSESSMENT OF CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
Challenges/Areas for improvement
1.80 The Social Auditor should identify the challenges faced by the stakeholders and the areas for improvement based on the suggestions and feedback received from them, which might influence the impact assessment. Some of the examples of commonly faced issues about promoting slum area development, affordable housing, and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities may include the following:
Any significant issues observed during the assessment, that may influence the user of the Impact Assessment in decision making, should be highlighted by the Social Auditor in the Social Audit report.
Limitations of the assessment
1.90 The Social Auditor should identify the inherent limitations of the evaluation process which might influence the impact assessment. Some of the examples of promoting slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities:
Any significant limitation observed during the assessment, that may influence the user of the Impact Assessment in decision making, should be highlighted by the Social Auditor in the Social Audit report.
SECTION IV – APPENDIX
Taxonomic classification of areas and sub-areas for social objectives
(relating to Slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and resilient cities)
Sr. No. |
Areas | Sub Areas |
11 | Slum area development, affordable housing and other interventions to build sustainable and |
|
*****
To Read Related post Social Audit Standard