Read all latest corporate law news, articles, notifications & circular on Taxguru.in. News on laws related to DIPP Labour Minimum Wages Gratuity PF Arbitration Negotiable instrument Essential Commodities SRFAESI Competition Act Corporate Law
Corporate Law : Bajaj Auto's buyback schedule illustrates compliance with SEBI buyback timeline requirements using working-day calculations and pr...
Corporate Law : Learn the CDSCO registration process, applicable laws, approvals, licensing routes, compliance obligations and recent regulatory d...
Corporate Law : Government notifies EPF, EPS and EDLI Schemes, 2026 under the Code on Social Security, 2020 with digital compliance and preserved ...
Corporate Law : Learn the Make in India Certificate process, local-content rules, supplier categories, certification requirements and tender compl...
Corporate Law : FAQ document explains SIT status, possible CBI/ED investigations, relevant BNS provisions, PMLA aspects, and investigative framewo...
Corporate Law : EPFO's Amnesty Scheme 2026 offers retrospective PF Trust regularisation, specified compliance waivers and application window of si...
Corporate Law : DPIIT amends footwear QCOs by extending legacy stock clearance to 31 July 2027 and permitting annual import of 4,500 footwear samp...
Corporate Law : PIB issues a detailed FAQ on the Ethanol Blended Petrol Programme covering policy evolution, E20 rollout, vehicle compatibility, p...
Corporate Law : PIB outlines Indias E20 ethanol blending progress, programme milestones, industry views, and responses to frequently raised concer...
Corporate Law : NSE FAQs explain Regulation 42 Record Date filing, NEAPS submission, timelines, rights issue requirements and compliance under SEB...
Corporate Law : Calcutta HC ordered provisional release of seized areca nuts subject to CBIC safeguards and directed customs adjudication within e...
Corporate Law : Calcutta HC quashed the EPF recovery notice against the principal employer, holding it was not a party to the Section 7A proceedin...
Corporate Law : NCLT Delhi dismissed a Section 9 IBC petition, holding that default under a post-settlement deed is not an operational debt under ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT Chennai dismissed the Section 95 IBC appeal after holding debt, default and personal guarantor status stood admitted through...
Corporate Law : NCLAT upheld Section 9 admission, finding no genuine pre-existing dispute and sustaining CIRP against the Corporate Debtor....
Corporate Law : IRDAI clarifies the Appointed Actuary's role, Independent Validation, Ind AS consolidation and FAQs on implementation under Circul...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspended an Insolvency Professional for two years over asset valuation and Information Memorandum disclosure lapses during C...
Corporate Law : IRDAI has revised financial result formats for listed insurers adopting Ind AS to meet SEBI LODR disclosure requirements, effectiv...
Corporate Law : IBBI extends the deadline for filing PGIRP-1 to PGIRP-6 forms to 30 September 2026 and defers penalties while directing accurate e...
Corporate Law : PFRDA expands NPS investment options for CAB subscribers by adding two Auto Choice schemes through Circular No. PFRDA/2026/39 date...
The doctrine of fairness also is now considered to be a relevant factor for construing a statute. In a case of this nature where the effect of a beneficent statute was sought to be extended keeping in view the fact that the benefit was already availed of by the agriculturalists of tobacco in Guntur, it would be highly unfair if the benefit granted to them is taken away,
The law is well settled that a person who claims exemption or concession has to establish that he is entitled to that exemption or concession. A provision providing for an exemption, concession or exception, as the case may be, has to be constructed strictly with certain exceptions depending upon the settings on which the provisions has been placed in the statue and the object and purpose to be achieved.
The mention of the particular matters referred to in sub-sections (3) to (8) shall not be held to prejudice or affect the general application of section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 (10 of 1897) with regard to the effect of repeal.
The Apex Court in Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v. State of Maharashtra (1994) 4 SCC 602 held that a law which affects the substantive rights of any of the parties, the law cannot be retrospective. Every party has a vested right in substantative law but no such right exists in procedural law.
The issue under consideration is whether the employee joined as a trainee is eligible for gratuity as per Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972?
A retrospective operation is not to be given to a statute, so as the impair existing right or obligation otherwise than as regards matter of procedure unless that effect cannot be avoided without doing violence to the language of the enactment.
In 1973, the Law Commission of India after studying various Acts and prevailing benami system, recommended formulating an Act to tackle the issue. Accordingly, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 was enacted by the Parliament which came into force on 05.09.1988 and it prohibits benami transactions and the right to recover property held benami. The […]
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 83 of the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (60 of 1976), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely:- 1. Short Title, Extent, Application and Commencement:- These rules may be called the Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977. 2) They shall extend to the whole of India
Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India and others v Ogale glass Works 1971 AIR 2577 held that the award of industrial tribunal cannot stand in the way of enforcing the statutory provision cast on the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
Short title, extent and application.- (1) This Act may be called the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. (2) It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. (3) Subject to the provisions contained in section 16, it applies – (a) to every establishment which is a factory engaged in any industry specified in Schedule I and in which twenty or more persons are employed and
