The DRT Karnataka allowed recovery of ₹99.81 lakh after the borrower failed to appear and the bank’s documents proved the loan, hypothecation, and default. The tribunal granted recovery with 12% simple interest.
The tribunal held that installation and HVAC works involved supply of materials such as piping and wiring on which VAT was paid. Therefore, the contracts qualified as works contract service and not pure service.
The Court held that assignment of leasehold rights in an industrial plot amounts to transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and does not constitute a supply of services under GST.
The Allahabad High Court held that interest cannot be imposed in an adjudication order if it was not specified in the show cause notice. Such action violates Section 75(7) of the GST Act.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that authorities cannot block input tax credit beyond the balance available in the Electronic Credit Ledger. Rule 86A allows restriction only on credit actually available at the time of invocation.
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot deny refund interest by attributing delay to the assessee. The decision clarified that only higher authorities specified in Section 244A(2) can determine such delay.
The Bombay High Court stayed recovery and adjudication in GST cases involving assignment of leasehold rights. The court held that interim protection is justified since the legal issue is currently under consideration by the Supreme Court.
The Authority allowed withdrawal of the application since regulations permit applicants to withdraw requests anytime before an advance ruling is pronounced.
CAAR Mumbai rejected an advance ruling request on roasted areca nuts, holding that the classification issue had already been decided by the Madras High Court and no new facts were presented.
The authority refused to admit an advance ruling request on roasted areca nuts because the classification issue had already been decided by the Madras High Court. The ruling reiterates that applications cannot be entertained when courts have already settled the question.
