Sri Dashmesh Academy Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Chandigarh) Identical contentions as were raised by the representatives of the Trust before the lower authorities that the Trust is controlled and managed by the Government or that its funds and properties otherwise belong to the Government, have been raised by the counsel for the assessee Trust […]
Armour Steel Buildings India (P) Ltd. Vs Asstt. State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) The petitioner, an assessee under the GST Act in Tamil Nadu, sent goods across to the State. The Assistant State Tax Officer intercepted the goods and detained them. After the initial procedural formalities the petitioner suffered an order under section 129 […]
It has come to the notice of SEBI that investors in India are being offered services by various firms through online web portals to trade in a variety of financial products including various types of derivatives, which are apparently traded on overseas platform/exchange.
Sushila N. Rungta Vs TRO (Supreme Court) What has been argued by Mr. R. Venkataramani, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, is that considering that the Gold Control Act itself has been repealed without a saving clause, Section 6 of the General Clauses Act would not apply for the reason that the […]
Imarti Lakdi Vyapari Sansthan, Jodhpur Vs State Of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur) Rajasthan High Court has held that the levy under section 17 of the Rajasthan Agriculture Produce Marketing Act, 1961 is a ‘ Fee ’ and not a cess and therefore, the same is not abolished after the rollout of GST. The […]
In re Shri Kailash Chandra (GST AAR Rajasthan) Whether the activity of Operation and Maintenance (O & M) of Fluoride control project on ESCO Model and O & M work supply of goods or supply of services and what shall be the rate of GST on it? In the given contract, the activity of O […]
Efforts should also be made to dispose of non-time-barring assessments in significant numbers after the time-barring assessments have been completed so that cash collection from the current demand can be made during the current financial year itself.
Sh. Raman Khaira Vs M/s. Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) We have carefully considered the Report filed by the Applicant No. 2 as well as the submissions made by the Respondent No. 1 and it is obvious from the narration of the facts stated above that the investigation conducted in the matter […]
Respondent could not establish profiteering for want of cogent and reliable evidence and hence no violation of the provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act 2017 has been found in this case.
Notification under section 396 of CA 2013 – ROC Vijayawada dated 26.10.2018- MCA establishes the office of the Registrar of Companies at Vijayawada for discharging function under Cos. Act Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notifications New Delhi, Dated: 26.10.2018 S.O. (E) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 396 of […]
