CBIC notifies transition plan with respect to J&K reorganization w.e.f. 31.10.2019 Notification No. 62/2019 – Central Tax dated 26th November, 2019. Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Notification No. 62/2019 – Central Tax New Delhi, the 26th November, 2019 G.S.R. 879(E). – In exercise of […]
CBIC extends the due date for furnishing of return in FORM GSTR-1 for registered persons in Jammu and Kashmir having aggregate turnover more than 1.5 crore rupees for the months of July, 2019 to September, 2019 vide Notification No. 57/2019 – Central Tax dated 26th November, 2019. Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of […]
Observing that the ex- gratia charges made by principal to assessee- appellant were towards making good losses or injuries arising from unintended events and did not emanate from any obligation on part of any of the parties to tolerate an act or a situation, CESTAT Allahabad has held that the payment cannot be considered to be for some services.
The GST Council in its 27th meeting held on 4th May, 2018 resolved that GSTN will be converted into a 100% Government-owned entity by transferring 51% equity shares held by the Non-Government Institutions to the Centre and States equally.
Clause 4 of Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2019 seeks to insert new sections 115BAA and 115BAB in the Income tax Act relating to tax on income of certain domestic companies and tax on income of new manufacturing domestic companies.
Silicon Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India and others (Punjab and Haryana HC) The prayer made in the writ petition is inter alia seeking directions to the respondents to credit the ‘Input Tax Credit’, being the transitional credit, prescribed under Section 140 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, in the account […]
Assessee in instant case had purchased three properties on three different dates. This indicated that assessee had purchased the land on piece meal basis. Since value mentioned in each sale deed was less than Rs. 50 lakhs, therefore, section 194-IA would not be applicable to assessee merely because the seller and Khasra number of the three properties was same.
Prohibition imposed by Indian Medical Council against acceptance of gift was on medical practitioner/doctor, and not on pharmaceutical companies, therefore, where assessee incurred expenditure towards gifts, which were bearing logo and name of the assessee, the expenditure were only for sales promotion, therefore, disallowance made by AO in respect of the expenditure was unjustified.
In the case of paper based gift vouchers classifiable under CTH 4911 the applicable rate is 6% CGST as per Sl.No. 132 of Schedule II of the Notification No. 1/2017-C.T.(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and 6% SGST as per Sl.No. 132 of Schedule II of Notification Ms. No. II(2)/CTR/532(d-4)/2017 vide G.O. (Ms) No. 62 dated 29.06.2017 as amended.
Samsir Uddin Vs State of Assam (Gauhati High Court) In the instant case, the documents made available on record so far as it relates to violation of the provisions of the AGST Act are not being relied upon by the respondents to indicate any such violation of the provisions of the AGST Act. What is […]
