Ruchi Soya Industries Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (CESTAT Chennai) Ld. Counsel Shri Vishal Sundar submitted that Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated in respect of the appellant under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai (NCLT) dt. 08.12.2017 […]
Madras High Court clarifies the non-applicability of capital gains tax on transactions through power of attorney, setting a precedent for future cases.
Non-Appointment CS – penalty reduced – Ac imposing maximum penalty by Registrar of Companies on company, its Managing Director and other director is very harsh, burdensome on Company.
As Rule 8A (Appointment of Company Secretaries in Companies Not Covered Under Rule 8) of the Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 (w.e.f 09.06.2014), a company other than a company covered under Rule 8 which has a paid-up share capital of five crore rupees or more shall have a whole-time company secretary. […]
Filing of Form No. 67 under Rules 128 of Income Tax Rules is a procedural requirement, therefore, is a directory in nature, non-compliance thereof does not disentitled assessee in claiming Foreign Tax Credit (FTC)
Non levy of Anti Dumping duty is causing grave irreparable injury and prejudice to the Indian Manufactures on a daily basis.
Since the cause for which petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled was not clear from the cancellation order, therefore, learned State Counsel was asked to get instructions in the matter. Today, on instructions, he makes a statement that petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled for non-filing of GST returns for six consecutive months.
As petitioner is already before Appellate Authority, so it is not appropriate to detain the petition, as petitioner cannot ride on two horses: HC
w.e.f. 1.4.1999 computer software been included with computers for rate of depreciation in Rules, entitling assessee to 60% depreciation rate
CESTAT Ahmedabad exempts IPL player Ajitesh Kamlesh Argal from service tax on remuneration, setting a precedent on employment vs brand promotion in sports.
