CESTAT held that SSI Exemption cannot be denied for Trademark Registration in Family Member name, Jointly in Family Members Name or in partners name.
CBIC clarifies vide Circular No. 190/02/2023- GST Dated 13th January, 2023 on Applicability of GST on accommodation services supplied by Air Force Mess to its personnel and Applicability of GST on incentive paid by Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) to acquiring banks under Incentive scheme for promotion of RuPay Debit Cards and low […]
Directorate General of GST Intelligence Vs Nikit Mittal (Jharkhand High Court) This Court has perused the order passed in W.P.(Cr.) No. 415 of 2018 and other analogous cases and Cont. Case (Cvl) No. 665 of 2019 and other analogous cases as also the order passed by the writ Court in W.P.(Cr.) No. 14 of 2019 […]
CIT Vs Sikhya ‘O’ Anusandhan (Orissa High Court) Court in the first round of litigation accepted the legal position that without there being a valid search warrant authorizing the search in the premises of the Assessee under Section 132 of the Act, the question of initiating proceedings under Section 153A of the Act did not […]
An object beneficial to a section of the public is an object of general public utility. But the section of the community sought to be benefited must be sufficiently defined and identifiable by some common quality of a public order or impersonal nature.
In re Portescap India Private Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) AAAR held that any supply of goods or services or both made to a SEZ developer or SEZ unit for carrying out the authorised operation in SEZ will be considered as zero-rated supply. That is, the said supply will not attract any GST whatsoever. It is […]
Any action on part of the Assessing officer to verify utilization of amount deposited in capital gains account scheme needs to be undertaken or examined in the year when the period of three years from the date of transfer of original asset expires and not in year of transfer of original asset.
ITAT held that Investment referred in Section 142A pertains to Investment made by assessee in construction of property and not investment made in purchase of ready built house property.
It is observed that vide impugned order passed by Additional Commissioner (Appeal), the appeal of the petitioner against the order passed by Assistant Commissioner of State Taxes under Section 74 of BGST Act, 2017; and summary of order in Form GST DRC-07 has been rejected without considering the points taken by the petitioner in gross violation of principles of natural justice.
MCA imposes total penalty of Rs. 16,61,000 on ‘Star Solar Energy Systems India Private Limited‘ and its directors for violation of Section 92 (non-filing of Annual Return) and 137 (non-filing of Financial Statement) of the Companies Act, 2013 for the financial year 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-2020 & 2020-21. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS OFFICE […]
