Case Law Details
Ampro Chemicials GSTIN Lotous Vs Commissioner State Goods and Services Tax Commissionerate Dehhradun (Uttarakhand High Court)
Since the cause for which petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled was not clear from the cancellation order, therefore, learned State Counsel was asked to get instructions in the matter. Today, on instructions, he makes a statement that petitioner’s GST registration was cancelled for non-filing of GST returns for six consecutive months.
HC held that In view of consensus between the parties that matter is covered by the order passed in writ petition No. 75 of 2023 (M/S), present writ petition is also decided in terms of the said order. Petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revocation of cancellation order under Section 30 of Central GST Act within two weeks. With his application, petitioner shall also furnish all the GST returns which he failed to submit and he will also deposit the outstanding dues of Goods and Service Tax with his application. If he makes the application within stipulated time, the competent authority shall consider petitioner’s application and pass appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT
Mr. Ashish Agarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
