Follow Us:

Addition U/s. 68 justified if Assessee failed to establish creditworthiness of donors

March 4, 2018 1239 Views 0 comment Print

Where assessee had failed in establishing the creditworthiness of the donors, occasion for making the gifts and why the donors who were strangers and not men of means gifted such huge amounts to the assessee- HUF out of love and affection, therefore, addition made by AO was justified.

Delay in service of notice U/s. 143(2) invalidates Scrutiny assessment

March 4, 2018 3393 Views 0 comment Print

Pr. CIT Vs. National Informatics Center Services Inc. (Delhi High Court) Date of filing of the return of income is 25-09-2009. Therefore, the notice served on the taxpayer u/s 143(2) on 26-08-2011 is beyond the period of six months from the end of the financial year in which the return was furnished. Therefore, the notice […]

Revenue cannot treat LTCG as STCG on the ground that assessee deliberately waited for lapse of 36 months

March 3, 2018 2145 Views 0 comment Print

The objection of the revenue that the assessee intentionally waited for mechanical lapse of 36 months and deliberately put the date on agreement as 18-11-2009 to avoid the payment of tax is not tenable.

Registration U/s. 12A/12AA cannot be denied for non-production of books & vouchers

March 3, 2018 4296 Views 0 comment Print

CIT is not justified in rejecting registration on the ground that the non-production of books and vouchers means that the genuineness of the charitable activities cannot be verified. The CIT is entitled only to examine the objects of the trust at the stage of registration and not the books of account

Addition cannot be made on the basis of unsigned impounded dumb document

March 3, 2018 3174 Views 0 comment Print

Devaram C. Bhavani Vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai) We have given a thoughtful consideration to the notings in the impounded document, viz. Annexure A-2– Page 37 & Page 105 and are unable to persuade ourselves to be in agreement with the view taken by the lower authorities. We find that as against the working of the amount […]

Explanation to section 73 supersede provision of section 43(5)(d)

March 3, 2018 3846 Views 0 comment Print

ITO Vs. M/s. Arandi Investments Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Assessing Officer treated loss in future and options (F&O) transactions as speculation loss and disallowed the same. We find that on this issue, the A.O. has referred to Honorable Delhi High Court decisions on identical issue. The Honorable Delhi High Court in the case of CIT […]

ITAT upheld tax on LTCG on sale of shares for substantial price hike in short time

March 3, 2018 2124 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT held that fantastic sale price was not at all possible as there was no economic or financial basis as to how a share worth Rs. 5 of a little known company would jump from Rs. 5 to Rs. 485. AO was justified in denying exemption under section 10(38) to assessee, being fantastic sale price was not at all possible in such a short time.

18% GST applies on Setting up & operation of solar power plant: AAR

March 3, 2018 4317 Views 0 comment Print

In re Fermi Solar Farms Private Ltd. (AAR Maharashtra) Q.1 Whether in case of separate contracts for supply of goods and services for a solar power plant, there would be separate taxability of goods as ‘solar power generating system’ at 5% and services at 18%? A.1 The agreements tendered in support of this question reveal […]

Unrecognized courses comes within the meaning of education for exemption U/s. 11

March 2, 2018 2223 Views 0 comment Print

ITO (E) Vs. M/s Young Women’s Christian Association of Delhi (ITAT Delhi) Unrecognized courses are also comes within the meaning of education or in other words, it can be said that the charitable purposes includes relief to the poor, education (yoga), medical relief, preservation of environment and preservation of monuments or placed or objects of […]

Penalty cannot be imposed for Mere ALP computation method change by TPO

March 2, 2018 1830 Views 0 comment Print

It is seen that the grounds on which the ALP determined by the assessee has been rejected are reasonably debatable. The assessee had obtained a transfer pricing study from an outside expert and the objectivity of the same was not called into question.

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031