Natthani Infrastructures Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has made an application on 05.04.2018 before the respondent authorities for reimbursement of additional Goods and Services Tax (GST) liability on civil contract and work order issued prior to implementation of Goods and Services Tax Act, […]
Shri Jafrudin Kaji Vs The ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) It is an undisputed fact that the assessee sold land for Rs.72 lakhs as evident from the sale deed. Therefore, the argument of the learned counsel for the assessee that the amount of cash deposits represents the sale consideration of agriculture land is without any substance. However, […]
In re Visvesvaraya National Institute Of Technology (GST AAR Maharashtra) We find that in the present application as per submissions made before us, the applicant is recipient of service and not service providers and also that these services are not under reverse charge mechanism. The notification as referred by them, is applicable to provider of […]
The office address of DGFT and its Regional Authorities and their Jurisdiction have been updated and private SEZs from SI.No.47 to 53 have been added to Appendix 1A of Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20.
When such extraction of toddy is carried on from the trees belonging to the members of the Society, it is definitely an agricultural produce grown by its members. Vending of such produce grown by its members even under a regulatory regime would be marketing of an agricultural produce.
M A Zahid Vs ACIT (Karnataka High Court) In this case First and foremost the petitioner is not accused of committing any non-bailable offence so as to invoke the jurisdiction under section 438 of Cr.P.C. Secondly, the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is also without any basis. As could be seen from the above Rules, […]
The services provided by the applicant, i.e. Man Power services to Hospital – cum – General Medical College and State University do not qualify for exemption under Sr. No. 66 of notification no. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and corresponding notification No. 47/ST-2 Dt. 30.06.2017 of the State Tax.
Seeks to increase the tariff rate on goods in chapters 7, 8, 28, 38, 72 and 73 in the First Schedule to the Customs tariff Act, 1975 vide Notification No. 48/2018–Customs dated 20th June, 2018.
Under Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the refund of IGST paid on exports of goods is to be disbursed by Customs. For this COST System transmits invoice level data, after validations, to the ICEGATE system, which would further validate with Shipping Bill and process the refund.
The captioned appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [AY] 2005-06 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-18 [CIT(A)], Mumbai, Appeal No.CIT(A)-18/T-62/ITO 19(3) (2)/10-11 dated 14/01/2013 qua confirmation of certain addition on account of cash credit u/s 68 for Rs.4 Lacs.
