Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Insurance Premium for Family Members of Employees is Business Expense

September 21, 2018 10968 Views 0 comment Print

Loesche India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Delhi) The record reveals that the assessee had paid the insurance premiums of the employees’ family members in terms of employment Rules framed by the assessee-company there for. Therefore, it can hardly be said that the impugned expenditure were not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose […]

3% Tax Rate benefit under MVAT Act cannot be given prior to 14.10.2017

September 21, 2018 3261 Views 0 comment Print

Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. Vs The State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) The only question that we have to consider is whether this concessional rate of duty could be availed of by the petitioner from 24.08.2017 to 13.10.2017. The intervening period where the taxable person under MGST Act does not continue to be […]

Extend Tax Audit Report Filing Due Date: SGTTA

September 21, 2018 5643 Views 8 comments Print

South Gujarat textile traders association is the leading trade organization of south Gujarat. It is representing more than 40000 traders of surat and entire south Gujarat. The association has played vital role in disseminating awareness about GST and has held hundreds of meetings to clarify the doubts of the trade and industry.

KYC requirements for Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs)

September 21, 2018 1629 Views 0 comment Print

KYC Review means steps taken to ensure that documents, data or information collected under the due-diligence process are kept up-to-date and relevant by undertaking reviews of existing records on a periodical basis. FPIs shall be subject to KYC review as and when there is any change in material information / disclosure.

Co-origination of loans by Banks and NBFCs for lending to priority sector

September 21, 2018 1605 Views 0 comment Print

The bank can claim priority sector status in respect of its share of credit while engaging in the co-origination arrangement. However, the priority sector assets on the bank’s books should at all times be without recourse to the NBFC. Further, the loans extended by foreign banks under the co-origination framework shall be restricted only to loans qualifying as priority sector assets.

Gift not deductible as Business Expense in absence of business exigencies & failure to disclose identity of gift recipient

September 21, 2018 6546 Views 0 comment Print

Assessee has failed to disclose the identity of the recipient of gifts either during the assessment proceedings or during the appellate proceedings. The ld. CIT(A) has also examined the records and found that the assessee also failed to establish the business exigencies of the appellant vis-a-vis the aforesaid gifts.

Implications of TCS on E-Commerce Industry

September 20, 2018 4455 Views 0 comment Print

E-Commerce industry had unique place in GST regime. TCS (Tax collected at source) provisions were incorporated into the GST act, however the provisions were not actively notified.

Amendment in Transitional Provision, 2018: Too Ambiguous….. Grossly unfair

September 20, 2018 1449 Views 0 comment Print

Apparently there appears to be an attempt to shrink the ambit and scope of Transactional Provision and it requires immediate attention considering the wide impact it is going to have on the persons who have rightly availed the CENVAT Credit of the Service tax and bonafidly carried forward with the advent of the GST regime.

HC allows Payment of GST Arrears in Installments 

September 20, 2018 2202 Views 0 comment Print

M/s Indus Projects Limited Vs UOI (Gujarat High Court) 1. Petitioner has to pay GST dues of Rs.3.85 crores (rounded off), for which, due to its financial difficulties, the petitioner has applied to the authority for installments. Such request came to be turned down by the impugned order dated 30.08.2018 without assigning reasons. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that […]

Addition for Bogus Share Capital cannot be made on the basis of mere suspicion

September 20, 2018 837 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal, on examination of facts, has come to the conclusion that the investment made by the shareholders is not hit by Section 68 of the Act. It records, that the entire basis of the Revenue’s case is based on surmise that the respondent was taking bogus purchase bills and cash was introduced in the form of share capital without any evidence in support. Therefore, the view taken by the impugned order of the Tribunal on facts is a possible.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031