ACIT Vs Goldmohur Design And Apparel Park Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) Bombay High Court in CIT vs Gangadeep Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (394 ITR 680)(Bom.) held in this context to the pre-amended section 68 has held that where the Revenue urges that the amount of share application money has been received from bogus shareholders then it is […]
Central Bureau of Investigation has arrested an Income Tax Inspector, working in the office of Joint Commissioner, Income Tax, Range-III, Lucknow and a private person in a bribery case of Rs. 10 lakh.
It is announced for general information that during the year 2018-2019, accumulations at the credit of subscribers to the General Provident Fund and other similar funds shall carry interest at the rate of 8% (Eight percent) w.e.f. 1st October, 2018 to 31st December, 2018.
The objective of Exposure Draft Accounting Standard (AS) 38 Intangible Assets is to prescribe the accounting treatment for intangible assets that are not dealt with specifically in another Standard. This Standard requires an entity to recognise an intangible asset if, and only if, specified criteria are met.
All the RAs and the members of trade are being informed that due to unavoidable circumstances. the SEIS E com module which was earlier announced to be ready for accepting applications from 03.10.2018 would now be available from Monday 08.10.2018.
Key Features – Return Preparation Utility (RPU) version 2.4 ♦ Integration of new Encryption certificate in File Validation Utilities (FVUs) > Renewed Encryption certificate with extended validity has been integrated in FVUs ♦ Incorporation of latest File Validation Utility (FVU) version 5.9 (applicable for TDS/TCS statements pertaining to FY 2010-11 onwards) and FVU version 2.155 […]
M/s. Khivraj Techpark Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai) The issue that arises for consideration is whether the appellants are liable to pay service tax on the rent received for leasing the fit outs. Undisputedly, the appellants have entered into two different agreements for leasing the premises and leasing the fit The […]
Where AO after making adequate enquiries and verification held that forward contract loss was allowable as normal business loss, CIT was not justified in treating the same as speculative one and the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue.
M/s Runwal Projects Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) There is no dispute with regard to the fact of receipt of on-money from sale of flats. This fact has been admitted by the assessee including its director in the statement recorded during the course of search. This fact is also supported by incriminating material found […]
M/s. Apollo Tyres Limited Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Cochin) A draft order, as such, is not appealable, except to be challenged by the assessee before the DRP, which exercises the power, inter alia, to make enhancement. The very rationale in the giving the power of enhancement to the DRP is to correct the draft order […]
