Follow Us:

Notification NO. 135/2009-Customs Duty (N.T.), Dated: 09.09.2009

September 9, 2009 445 Views 0 comment Print

for the purpose of adjudicating the matters relating to Show Cause Notice pertaining to M/s. Harkarandass Deepchand, 455, Khari Baoli, Delhi and others, issued vide, DRI F.No. 50D/161/2006-C.I., dated 20th February, 2009, by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, 7th Floor, D Block, I.P.Bhavan, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110 002.

Notification No.134/2009-Customs Duty (N.T.), Dated: 09.09.2009

September 9, 2009 376 Views 0 comment Print

for the purpose of adjudicating the matters relating to Show Cause Notice pertaining to M/s. Petrosolv India Company, 108, National Storage Building, S.B.Road, Mahim (W), Mumbai 400 016 and others, issued vide, F.No. DRI/BZU/F/07/2005/SCN-BULK, dated 30th September, 2008 / 10th October, 2008, by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Mumbai Zonal Unit, Mumbai.

Amends Notification No.15/2002-Customs Duty (N.T.), Dated: 07.03.2002

September 9, 2009 592 Views 0 comment Print

The principal Notification No.15/2002-Customs (N.T.), dated the 7th March, 2002 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R.171 (E), dated the 7th March, 2002 and was last amended by notification No.108/2008-Customs (N.T.), dated the 23rd September, 2008 [G.S.R. (E) 675 dated the 23rd September, 2008].

Notification No. 132/2009–Customs (N.T.) Dated: 09.09.2009

September 9, 2009 577 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs, hereby appoints,- (i) the Commissioner of Central Excise, Siliguri to be the Commissioner of Customs within the jurisdiction of the: (a) districts of Darjeeling, Jalpaiguri, Coochbehar and North Dinajpur in the State of West Bengal; and (b) the State of Sikkim.

Policy Circular No. 06/2009-2014, Dated: 09.09.2009

September 9, 2009 853 Views 0 comment Print

Attention is invited to Policy Circular No. 78(RE-08/2004-09) dated 1.4.2009 to be read with Policy Circular No. 97(RE-08/2004-09) dated 8.7.2009 and Ministry of Environment and Forests Notification No. S.O.(E).1799 dated 21.7.2009 on the subject mentioned above.

Import Policy of Carbon black and Other, of polyesters

September 9, 2009 415 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of powers conferred by Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 read with paragraph 2.1 of the Foreign Trade Policy – 2009-2014, the Central Government hereby amends Schedule – I (Imports) of the ITC (HS) Classifications of Export and Import Items.

Valuation of perquisites / fringe benefits after abolition of FBT

September 9, 2009 1894 Views 0 comment Print

As per the aforesaid newly inserted section 115WM, nothing contained in Chapter XII-H shall apply, in respect of any assessment for the assessment year (AY), commencing on 1.4.2010, or any subsequent AY. In other words, the fringe benefit tax (FBT) has been abolished from the AY 2010-11, onwards, i.e. from the financial year (FY) 2009-10, onwards.

Recognition can not be denied U/s. 80G (5) only on the ground that the particulars of donors are not provided by Institution or fund

September 9, 2009 3159 Views 0 comment Print

We have considered the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In our considered view , the reasons advanced by the learned CIT for refusing to grant continuation of recognition u/s 80G(5) are superfluous and do not stand to legal scrutiny within the meaning of section 80G(5).

Payment made in cash for purchase from local producers either directly or through their agents and disallowance of expense u/s. 40A(3)

September 9, 2009 4054 Views 0 comment Print

So far as addition u/s 40A(3) is concerned, the undisputed facts are that assessee has purchased raw hides/skins for the purposes of manufacturing leather and leather products from local producers either directly or through their agents. Even though the Assessing Officer issued letters to various producers and some of these have come back unserved but it does not prove that the producers of the skin from whom assessee had made purchases are non-existent.

Revision under section 263 of IT Act, 1961 is not reassessment

September 9, 2009 2147 Views 0 comment Print

The revision u/s. 263 is not like the reopening of the assessment where once the assessment is reopened entire assessment is open before the Assessing Officer to be reconsidered in accordance with law. In the revision proceedings, the CIT cannot travel beyond the reasons given by him for revision in the show cause notice.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031