Now, habitual absence from work without taking leave amounts to misconduct on the part of an employee. According to the ruling by the Mumbai High Court, a person in the habit of being absent without prior sanction, is somebody who is not devoted to duty. “We are of the view that an employee who is in habit of remaining absent without prior sanction of leave, irrespective of the number of days, is guilty of misconduct under the rules,” observed a division bench recently while upholding dismissal of a Bharat Sanchar Nigam (BSNL) employee, Pandurang Kevne, who filed a petition challenging his removal.
The second proviso to section 10B(1) cannot be construed to be a qualifying condition for claiming deduction. It just permits additional benefit which may be allowed provided domestic profit is within the limit prescribed in the proviso. On the panoply of this proviso deduction cannot be denied. The assessee would be entitled to partial deduction proportionately on export turnover in view of the provisions of sub-section(4) of section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
NOTIFICATION No. 187/2009-CUSTOMS (N.T.) In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules, namely:-1. Short title and commencement.- (1) These rules may be called the Customs Tariff (Determination of Origin of Goods under the Preferential Trade Agreement between the Governments of the Republic of India and the Republic of Korea) Rules, 2009.
Notification No. 97/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Mother’s Service Society, Puducherry has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in the category of
Notification No. 100/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules), from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in
Notification No. 99/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Giri Institute of Development Studies, Lucknow has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in
Notification No. 98/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Madras School of Economics, Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules) from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in the category of
Notification No. 96/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization The Institute of Road Transport, Chennai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules), from Assessment year 2009-2010 onwards in the
Notification No. 95/2009 – Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Diabetic Association of India, Mumbai has been approved by the Central Government for the purpose of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (said Act), read with Rules 5C and 5E of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (said Rules), from Assessment year 2007-08 onwards in the category of
G.S.R. (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rules (1) and (2) of rule 3 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby invests the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Mangalore with all the powers of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) Bangalore-II, for the purpose of deciding the following appeals, in accordance with the provisions of section 35A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (Act No. 1 of 1944), namely:-
