Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amann Sadiq Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Amann Sadiq Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Assessee provided KYC services to One97 Communications Ltd. & filed his return for AY 2018–19 declaring receipts of ₹96,82,565, based on Form 26AS available at the time of filing. Later, Form 26AS was updated in Feb 2019, showing additional receipts of ₹16,18,485, representing invoices dated April & May 2018 pertaining to AY 2019–20.

AO added this difference as unreported receipts in AY 2018–19. CIT(A) confirmed the addition.

Before ITAT, Assessee showed that:

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment After 31-03-2024 Held Time-Barred; First Proviso to Sec. 149(1) Overrides 148A – Entire Proceedings Quashed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728