Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCL Estates Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

PCL Estates Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Email Glitch Denied Fair Hearing — ITAT Restores ₹8.9 Cr Loan Addition Case to CIT(A)

Assessee, engaged in real estate, filed its return declaring investments of ₹9.36 crore &  unsecured loans aggregating ₹8.67 crore. AO treated the entire ₹8.90 crore as unexplained cash credit u/s 68, citing lack of evidence on the genuineness of loans received from M/s Flavour & Fragrance Ingredients &  M/s Kukreja Construction Co.

Before CIT(A), Assessee did not attend the hearings, allegedly because the email

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment After 31-03-2024 Held Time-Barred; First Proviso to Sec. 149(1) Overrides 148A – Entire Proceedings Quashed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728