Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCL Estates Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

PCL Estates Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Email Glitch Denied Fair Hearing — ITAT Restores ₹8.9 Cr Loan Addition Case to CIT(A)

Assessee, engaged in real estate, filed its return declaring investments of ₹9.36 crore &  unsecured loans aggregating ₹8.67 crore. AO treated the entire ₹8.90 crore as unexplained cash credit u/s 68, citing lack of evidence on the genuineness of loans received from M/s Flavour & Fragrance Ingredients &  M/s Kukreja Construction Co.

Before CIT(A), Assessee did not attend the hearings, allegedly because the email

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Bangalore Quashes U/s 143(3) Assessment for Want of U/s 153C Jurisdiction ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271D Penalty on Cash Sale Receipt ITAT Bangalore Deletes Section 271FAA Penalty for SFT Delay Second OGE Non-Est; Two U/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 Orders for Same AY Invalid – Revenue Appeals Dismissed by ITAT Bangalore ITAT Chandigarh Allows Sec 80P(2)(d) Deduction – 31 Oct Due Date Applies Due to Statutory Audit View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728