Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCL Estates Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCL Estates Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Email Glitch Denied Fair Hearing — ITAT Restores ₹8.9 Cr Loan Addition Case to CIT(A) Assessee, engaged in real estate, filed its return declaring investments of ₹9.36 crore &  unsecured loans aggregating ₹8.67 crore. AO treated the entire ₹8.90 crore as unexplained cash credit u/s 68, citing lack of evidence on the genuineness of loans received from M/s Flavour & Fragrance Ingredients &  M/s Kukreja Construction Co. Before CIT(A), Assessee did not attend the hearings, allegedly because the email ID registered was non-fun...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Gross Profit Cannot Be Estimated Without Rejecting Books: Bangalore ITAT Section 148 Notice Quashed for Lack of Section 151(ii) Approval: Hyderabad ITAT Wrong Mention of Section 69 Instead of 69A Does Not Invalidate Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Gift from Mother Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Investment: ITAT Hyderabad Temporary Cash Support for Student Visa Is Not a Loan Under Section 269SS: ITAT Chennai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031