Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balsingh Rajkumar Balsingh Vs DCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balsingh Rajkumar Balsingh Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) Madras High Court Keeps Recovery in Abeyance Pending Appeal & Rectification – Relief to Assessee on Bank Attachment u/s 226(3) Petitioner filed two writ petitions challenging bank account attachment notices u/s 226(3) issued by the Income-tax Department for A.Ys. 2021-22 & 2022-23. The attachments were made following assessment orders dated 19.03.2024 & 16.03.2024, respectively, and were directed to multiple banks — HDFC & State Bank of India – as well as the Petitioner’s client, Golden Homes Pvt. Ltd., to recov...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930