Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rashida Yahya Bangalorewala Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rashida Yahya Bangalorewala Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Cash Deposits from Son’s Mobile Trading Business – 69A Addition Deleted; Only 8% Presumptive Income Taxable u/s 44AD Assessee, an individual, did not file return originally. Based on RMS data, AO found cash deposits of ₹76,81,000/- in her SBI bank account. Proceedings u/s 148A(b) were initiated & reassessment notice u/s 148 was issued on 15.03.2024. In response, Assessee filed return offering income @ 5% u/s 44AD on turnover of ₹82,50,200/- amounting to ₹4,95,012. She explained that during Covid-19 financial crisis, her son was ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930