Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Saket Bansal Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Saket Bansal Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Search Jewellery Not Fully Unexplained – ITAT Grants Partial Relief Background Assessees (Saket & Abhishek Bansal) were covered in a search on Pacific Group (17.11.2021). At Locker No. 1132, Alaknanda Vaults Pvt. Ltd., jewellery worth ₹1.72 Cr. and bullion worth ₹34.52 lakh were found. AO held that 358.87 gms of gold jewellery (incl. coins), valued at ₹15.48 lakh (as on 14.01.2022 @ ₹4,314.78/gm), was unexplained. Addition made u/s 69B, taxed u/s 115BBE. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessees’ Arguments Claimed jewellery formed part of ope...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930