Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sunil Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-2022
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sunil Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ₹33 Lakh Cash Seized Accepted as Business Income – Section 115BBE Addition Deleted-Cash Seized Already Declared in ROI – Tribunal Rejects 60% Tax Levy-ITAT Hyderabad Background Assessee, engaged in electronic spare parts business, filed ROI declaring ₹54.37 lakh, which included cash seized. On 26.08.2020, during search proceedings, Department intercepted assessee carrying ₹33 lakh cash on a scooter. In sworn statement u/s 131(1A), assessee admitted cash belonged to him, sourced from business & rental income. AO rejected explanation, held...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930