Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : City Union Bank Vs PCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
City Union Bank Vs PCIT (ITAT Chennai) Bank filed ROI declaring ₹807.24 Cr income. AO in scrutiny u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B (12.09.2022) made only two disallowances- ₹8.79 lakh u/s 14A & ₹20.07 Cr CSR expense. PCIT, on record verification, held AO failed to examine three major claims- Non-rural bad debts written off u/s 36(1)(vii): ₹228.78 Cr, Employee Stock Option (ESOS) expenditure: ₹38.31 Cr.& Provision for bad debts u/s 36(1)(viia): ₹118.21 Cr. PCIT set aside assessment directing AO to redo enquiry. Assessee’s Arguments AO had issued detailed notices u/s 142(1) & 14...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930