Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vasudha Dattatraya Shinde Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vasudha Dattatraya Shinde Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Consenting Party cannot be taxed for Husband’s Property – ITAT Pune deletes ₹5 Cr LTCG Addition & Penalty Tribunal considered whether a “consenting party” in a development agreement could be taxed for capital gains. AO, based on registrar’s information, reopened assessment u/s 147 & treated assessee as 50% owner of a Pune property, making addition of ₹5 crore LTCG out of total consideration of ₹10 crore. Assessee explained that the property was exclusively owned & purchased by her husband, Mr. Dattatraya Pandurang Shinde,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031