Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vasudha Dattatraya Shinde Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vasudha Dattatraya Shinde Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Consenting Party cannot be taxed for Husband’s Property – ITAT Pune deletes ₹5 Cr LTCG Addition & Penalty Tribunal considered whether a “consenting party” in a development agreement could be taxed for capital gains. AO, based on registrar’s information, reopened assessment u/s 147 & treated assessee as 50% owner of a Pune property, making addition of ₹5 crore LTCG out of total consideration of ₹10 crore. Assessee explained that the property was exclusively owned & purchased by her husband, Mr. Dattatraya Pandurang Shinde,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930