Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Satishkumar Bhagatram Chadha Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Late Satishkumar Bhagatram Chadha Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) CIT(A) Order in Name of Deceased & Without Sharing Remand Report – ITAT Pune Restores Case Late Satishkumar Chadha had filed return on 09.03.2018. AO, for want of compliance, passed ex parte assessment u/s 144 on 09.12.2019 making addition of ₹16,13,000/- u/s 69A for unexplained deposits. Appeal was filed on 07.01.2020. However, during pendency of appeal, the Assessee died in September 2021. Despite this, CIT(A) passed order on 14.03.2025 in the name of the deceased, without bringing legal heirs on record. Further, CIT(A) had called ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930