Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Late Satishkumar Bhagatram Chadha Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Late Satishkumar Bhagatram Chadha Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) CIT(A) Order in Name of Deceased & Without Sharing Remand Report – ITAT Pune Restores Case Late Satishkumar Chadha had filed return on 09.03.2018. AO, for want of compliance, passed ex parte assessment u/s 144 on 09.12.2019 making addition of ₹16,13,000/- u/s 69A for unexplained deposits. Appeal was filed on 07.01.2020. However, during pendency of appeal, the Assessee died in September 2021. Despite this, CIT(A) passed order on 14.03.2025 in the name of the deceased, without bringing legal heirs on record. Further, CIT(A) had called ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930