Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vasudha Dattatraya Shinde Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Vasudha Dattatraya Shinde Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Consenting Party cannot be taxed for Husband’s Property – ITAT Pune deletes ₹5 Cr LTCG Addition & Penalty Tribunal considered whether a “consenting party” in a development agreement could be taxed for capital gains. AO, based on registrar’s information, reopened assessment u/s 147 & treated assessee as 50% owner of a Pune property, making addition of ₹5 crore LTCG out of total consideration of ₹10 crore. Assessee explained that the property was exclusively owned & purchased by her husband, Mr. Dattatraya Pandurang Shinde,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031