Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) TDS Delay After 01.06.2015 Attracts Mandatory 234E Late Fee- Default for Q3 FY 2015–16 After Amendment is Valid- ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT has upheld levy of late fee u/s 234E r.w.s. 200A on delayed filing of TDS statements, holding that since the default pertained to a period after 01.06.2015, the provisions were applicable & levy was valid. Late fee had been levied through intimations u/s 154 & u/s 200A/206CB dated 30.03.2017, amounting to ₹85,200 for delay in filing TDS statement for Q3 of FY 2015–16 (AY 2016–17). When t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031