Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hi Techno Control System Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) TDS Delay After 01.06.2015 Attracts Mandatory 234E Late Fee- Default for Q3 FY 2015–16 After Amendment is Valid- ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT has upheld levy of late fee u/s 234E r.w.s. 200A on delayed filing of TDS statements, holding that since the default pertained to a period after 01.06.2015, the provisions were applicable & levy was valid. Late fee had been levied through intimations u/s 154 & u/s 200A/206CB dated 30.03.2017, amounting to ₹85,200 for delay in filing TDS statement for Q3 of FY 2015–16 (AY 2016–17). When t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930